diff options
| author | sl <sl@deckard> | 2023-03-16 01:31:57 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | sl <sl@deckard> | 2023-03-16 01:31:57 +0000 |
| commit | 8560a458d2b4ade92ff8354e2a16db3256bead43 (patch) | |
| tree | 71b106317a5efe164b331b8228c10898853c5640 /lib | |
| parent | 0411083184b47915745fd3d5f2d29217cf14b4c9 (diff) | |
/lib/rsc: My plan is to not do any telemetry on Plan 9.
Diffstat (limited to 'lib')
| -rw-r--r-- | lib/rsc | 1 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 0 deletions
@@ -250,3 +250,4 @@ So it sounds like everyone is in favor of the entire generics proposal and all t Or perhaps Go will earn a reputation for doing telemetry well and people will say things like "Go is the only software with telemetry you don't need to worry about." I think it's too early to say which would happen. I am not suggesting that instrumentation be added by the Go compiler to all Go programs in the world: that's clearly inappropriate. The plan9 port is becoming increasingly difficult to maintain and holds back non-plan9 development. +My plan is to not do any telemetry on Plan 9. |