diff options
author | cinap_lenrek <cinap_lenrek@localhost> | 2011-05-03 11:25:13 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | cinap_lenrek <cinap_lenrek@localhost> | 2011-05-03 11:25:13 +0000 |
commit | 458120dd40db6b4df55a4e96b650e16798ef06a0 (patch) | |
tree | 8f82685be24fef97e715c6f5ca4c68d34d5074ee /sys/src/cmd/python/Doc/lib/emailparser.tex | |
parent | 3a742c699f6806c1145aea5149bf15de15a0afd7 (diff) |
add hg and python
Diffstat (limited to 'sys/src/cmd/python/Doc/lib/emailparser.tex')
-rw-r--r-- | sys/src/cmd/python/Doc/lib/emailparser.tex | 208 |
1 files changed, 208 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/sys/src/cmd/python/Doc/lib/emailparser.tex b/sys/src/cmd/python/Doc/lib/emailparser.tex new file mode 100644 index 000000000..609fa4008 --- /dev/null +++ b/sys/src/cmd/python/Doc/lib/emailparser.tex @@ -0,0 +1,208 @@ +\declaremodule{standard}{email.parser} +\modulesynopsis{Parse flat text email messages to produce a message + object structure.} + +Message object structures can be created in one of two ways: they can be +created from whole cloth by instantiating \class{Message} objects and +stringing them together via \method{attach()} and +\method{set_payload()} calls, or they can be created by parsing a flat text +representation of the email message. + +The \module{email} package provides a standard parser that understands +most email document structures, including MIME documents. You can +pass the parser a string or a file object, and the parser will return +to you the root \class{Message} instance of the object structure. For +simple, non-MIME messages the payload of this root object will likely +be a string containing the text of the message. For MIME +messages, the root object will return \code{True} from its +\method{is_multipart()} method, and the subparts can be accessed via +the \method{get_payload()} and \method{walk()} methods. + +There are actually two parser interfaces available for use, the classic +\class{Parser} API and the incremental \class{FeedParser} API. The classic +\class{Parser} API is fine if you have the entire text of the message in +memory as a string, or if the entire message lives in a file on the file +system. \class{FeedParser} is more appropriate for when you're reading the +message from a stream which might block waiting for more input (e.g. reading +an email message from a socket). The \class{FeedParser} can consume and parse +the message incrementally, and only returns the root object when you close the +parser\footnote{As of email package version 3.0, introduced in +Python 2.4, the classic \class{Parser} was re-implemented in terms of the +\class{FeedParser}, so the semantics and results are identical between the two +parsers.}. + +Note that the parser can be extended in limited ways, and of course +you can implement your own parser completely from scratch. There is +no magical connection between the \module{email} package's bundled +parser and the \class{Message} class, so your custom parser can create +message object trees any way it finds necessary. + +\subsubsection{FeedParser API} + +\versionadded{2.4} + +The \class{FeedParser}, imported from the \module{email.feedparser} module, +provides an API that is conducive to incremental parsing of email messages, +such as would be necessary when reading the text of an email message from a +source that can block (e.g. a socket). The +\class{FeedParser} can of course be used to parse an email message fully +contained in a string or a file, but the classic \class{Parser} API may be +more convenient for such use cases. The semantics and results of the two +parser APIs are identical. + +The \class{FeedParser}'s API is simple; you create an instance, feed it a +bunch of text until there's no more to feed it, then close the parser to +retrieve the root message object. The \class{FeedParser} is extremely +accurate when parsing standards-compliant messages, and it does a very good +job of parsing non-compliant messages, providing information about how a +message was deemed broken. It will populate a message object's \var{defects} +attribute with a list of any problems it found in a message. See the +\refmodule{email.errors} module for the list of defects that it can find. + +Here is the API for the \class{FeedParser}: + +\begin{classdesc}{FeedParser}{\optional{_factory}} +Create a \class{FeedParser} instance. Optional \var{_factory} is a +no-argument callable that will be called whenever a new message object is +needed. It defaults to the \class{email.message.Message} class. +\end{classdesc} + +\begin{methoddesc}[FeedParser]{feed}{data} +Feed the \class{FeedParser} some more data. \var{data} should be a +string containing one or more lines. The lines can be partial and the +\class{FeedParser} will stitch such partial lines together properly. The +lines in the string can have any of the common three line endings, carriage +return, newline, or carriage return and newline (they can even be mixed). +\end{methoddesc} + +\begin{methoddesc}[FeedParser]{close}{} +Closing a \class{FeedParser} completes the parsing of all previously fed data, +and returns the root message object. It is undefined what happens if you feed +more data to a closed \class{FeedParser}. +\end{methoddesc} + +\subsubsection{Parser class API} + +The \class{Parser} class, imported from the \module{email.parser} module, +provides an API that can be used to parse a message when the complete contents +of the message are available in a string or file. The +\module{email.parser} module also provides a second class, called +\class{HeaderParser} which can be used if you're only interested in +the headers of the message. \class{HeaderParser} can be much faster in +these situations, since it does not attempt to parse the message body, +instead setting the payload to the raw body as a string. +\class{HeaderParser} has the same API as the \class{Parser} class. + +\begin{classdesc}{Parser}{\optional{_class}} +The constructor for the \class{Parser} class takes an optional +argument \var{_class}. This must be a callable factory (such as a +function or a class), and it is used whenever a sub-message object +needs to be created. It defaults to \class{Message} (see +\refmodule{email.message}). The factory will be called without +arguments. + +The optional \var{strict} flag is ignored. \deprecated{2.4}{Because the +\class{Parser} class is a backward compatible API wrapper around the +new-in-Python 2.4 \class{FeedParser}, \emph{all} parsing is effectively +non-strict. You should simply stop passing a \var{strict} flag to the +\class{Parser} constructor.} + +\versionchanged[The \var{strict} flag was added]{2.2.2} +\versionchanged[The \var{strict} flag was deprecated]{2.4} +\end{classdesc} + +The other public \class{Parser} methods are: + +\begin{methoddesc}[Parser]{parse}{fp\optional{, headersonly}} +Read all the data from the file-like object \var{fp}, parse the +resulting text, and return the root message object. \var{fp} must +support both the \method{readline()} and the \method{read()} methods +on file-like objects. + +The text contained in \var{fp} must be formatted as a block of \rfc{2822} +style headers and header continuation lines, optionally preceded by a +envelope header. The header block is terminated either by the +end of the data or by a blank line. Following the header block is the +body of the message (which may contain MIME-encoded subparts). + +Optional \var{headersonly} is as with the \method{parse()} method. + +\versionchanged[The \var{headersonly} flag was added]{2.2.2} +\end{methoddesc} + +\begin{methoddesc}[Parser]{parsestr}{text\optional{, headersonly}} +Similar to the \method{parse()} method, except it takes a string +object instead of a file-like object. Calling this method on a string +is exactly equivalent to wrapping \var{text} in a \class{StringIO} +instance first and calling \method{parse()}. + +Optional \var{headersonly} is a flag specifying whether to stop +parsing after reading the headers or not. The default is \code{False}, +meaning it parses the entire contents of the file. + +\versionchanged[The \var{headersonly} flag was added]{2.2.2} +\end{methoddesc} + +Since creating a message object structure from a string or a file +object is such a common task, two functions are provided as a +convenience. They are available in the top-level \module{email} +package namespace. + +\begin{funcdesc}{message_from_string}{s\optional{, _class\optional{, strict}}} +Return a message object structure from a string. This is exactly +equivalent to \code{Parser().parsestr(s)}. Optional \var{_class} and +\var{strict} are interpreted as with the \class{Parser} class constructor. + +\versionchanged[The \var{strict} flag was added]{2.2.2} +\end{funcdesc} + +\begin{funcdesc}{message_from_file}{fp\optional{, _class\optional{, strict}}} +Return a message object structure tree from an open file object. This +is exactly equivalent to \code{Parser().parse(fp)}. Optional +\var{_class} and \var{strict} are interpreted as with the +\class{Parser} class constructor. + +\versionchanged[The \var{strict} flag was added]{2.2.2} +\end{funcdesc} + +Here's an example of how you might use this at an interactive Python +prompt: + +\begin{verbatim} +>>> import email +>>> msg = email.message_from_string(myString) +\end{verbatim} + +\subsubsection{Additional notes} + +Here are some notes on the parsing semantics: + +\begin{itemize} +\item Most non-\mimetype{multipart} type messages are parsed as a single + message object with a string payload. These objects will return + \code{False} for \method{is_multipart()}. Their + \method{get_payload()} method will return a string object. + +\item All \mimetype{multipart} type messages will be parsed as a + container message object with a list of sub-message objects for + their payload. The outer container message will return + \code{True} for \method{is_multipart()} and their + \method{get_payload()} method will return the list of + \class{Message} subparts. + +\item Most messages with a content type of \mimetype{message/*} + (e.g. \mimetype{message/delivery-status} and + \mimetype{message/rfc822}) will also be parsed as container + object containing a list payload of length 1. Their + \method{is_multipart()} method will return \code{True}. The + single element in the list payload will be a sub-message object. + +\item Some non-standards compliant messages may not be internally consistent + about their \mimetype{multipart}-edness. Such messages may have a + \mailheader{Content-Type} header of type \mimetype{multipart}, but their + \method{is_multipart()} method may return \code{False}. If such + messages were parsed with the \class{FeedParser}, they will have an + instance of the \class{MultipartInvariantViolationDefect} class in their + \var{defects} attribute list. See \refmodule{email.errors} for + details. +\end{itemize} |